POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Technology and Information Warfare

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 117-25] TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION WARFARE: THE COMPETITION FOR INFLUENCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing informs potential future legislative and budgetary oversight regarding how the U.S. military identifies and counters foreign influence campaigns and digital disinformation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency is the subject of oversight regarding its strategy and leadership in information operations.

Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information Systems

The committee members are responsible for legislative oversight and policy direction regarding cyber and information warfare.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information Systems held a hearing on April 30, 2021, to examine how the Department of Defense addresses technology-enabled and influence operations. Experts from research institutions and the Government Accountability Office provided testimony on the national security implications of these threats.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held remotely via Webex on April 30, 2021.
  • The subcommittee focused on the role of the Department of Defense in countering technology-enabled information warfare.
  • Witnesses included experts from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Wilson Center, Stanford University, and the Government Accountability Office.
  • The hearing established formal protocols for remote participation, including requirements for video visibility and microphone management.
  • No documents were submitted for the record during the hearing.
  • No questions were submitted by members during the hearing, though one post-hearing question was submitted by Mr. Moulton.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss how the Department of Defense manages and responds to technology-enabled and influence operations.
Who testified at this hearing?
The witnesses were Glenn S. Gerstell (CSIS), Nina Jankowicz (Wilson Center), Herbert Lin (Stanford University), and Joseph W. Kirschbaum (GAO).

Why It Matters

This hearing informs potential future legislative and budgetary oversight regarding how the U.S. military identifies and counters foreign influence campaigns and digital disinformation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Remote Hearing Protocols

The document highlights the formalization of remote hearing procedures (Webex, video requirements) as a standard operating procedure for the 117th Congress.

Connected Entities

personHerbert LinSenior Research Scholar, Stanford UniversityMap →
personNina JankowiczDisinformation Fellow, Wilson CenterMap →
organizationDepartment of DefenseSubject of the oversight hearingMap →
personGlenn S. GerstellSenior Adviser, Center for Strategic and International StudiesMap →
personElise M. StefanikRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personJames R. LangevinChairman of the Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information Map →
personJoseph W. KirschbaumDirector, Defense Capabilities and Management Team, GAOMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record