POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

2016 Defense Budget Hearing: U.S. European Command

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2016

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the stage for how federal tax dollars are allocated to the U.S. European Command to address specific military threats and international security commitments for the 2016 fiscal year.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. European Command

The command's budget and operational priorities for 2016 are being reviewed and determined by the subcommittee.

Taxpayers

The hearing determines the allocation of federal funds toward military operations in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the 2016 budget and operational for the U.S. European Command (EUCOM). The committee reviewed military threats and strategic priorities, including Russian activity, the fight against ISIL, and regional stability in the Middle East and Africa.

Key Facts

  • The subcommittee held a hearing on March 19, 2015, to discuss the 2016 budget and posture for the U.S. European Command.
  • The committee voted to move portions of the hearing involving classified material into a private executive session.
  • Chairman Frelinghuysen identified Russian aggression in the Black Sea and Baltic regions as a primary threat.
  • The command is tasked with supporting military intervention against ISIL and assisting CENTCOM in training Syrian opposition forces.
  • The committee is monitoring the influence of the Qods Force in Iran and the security risks posed by returning foreign fighters.
  • EUCOM is required to provide support to both CENTCOM and AFRICOM for ongoing crises in the Middle East and Africa.
  • General Philip M. Breedlove was the sole witness for the public portion of the hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing is part of the legislative process to review the budget and operational strategy of the U.S. European Command for the 2016 fiscal year.
Why was part of the meeting held in private?
The committee moved to an because the discussion involved classified military information.
What are the main security concerns mentioned for the European Command?
The Chairman highlighted Russian aggression, the fight against ISIL, the role of the Iranian , and the threat posed by returning foreign fighters.

Why It Matters

This hearing sets the stage for how federal tax dollars are allocated to the U.S. European Command to address specific military threats and international security commitments for the 2016 fiscal year.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of EUCOM Scope

The hearing highlights a shift where EUCOM is increasingly tasked with supporting operations in the Middle East and Africa, traditionally the domains of CENTCOM and AFRICOM.

Connected Entities

organizationU.S. European CommandThe military command under reviewMap →
organizationNATONorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationMap →
personRodney P. FrelinghuysenChairman of the Subcommittee on DefenseMap →
organizationCENTCOMU.S. Central CommandMap →
personPhilip M. BreedloveGeneral, U.S. Air Force, Supreme Allied Commander Europe and Commander of U.S. EMap →
personPeter J. ViscloskyRanking member of the subcommitteeMap →
organizationAFRICOMU.S. Africa CommandMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record