Hearing on Hybrid Warfare and National Security Challenges
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing informs potential changes to U.S. military doctrine and national security capabilities to better counter non-traditional threats from foreign adversaries.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Military
The military may be required to adapt its doctrine and capabilities to counter unconventional threats.
Foreign Adversaries (Russia, China, Iran)
These nations are identified as the primary users of the hybrid tactics being investigated by the committee.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on March 22, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The committee defined hybrid warfare as the use of centrally directed instruments of power—including cyber activity, media influence, and non-uniformed personnel—to achieve objectives below the threshold of traditional war.
- The Chairman identified Russia, China, and Iran as nations currently utilizing these hybrid tactics.
- The committee aims to develop new U.S. capabilities to counter these unconventional threats.
- The hearing included testimony from experts representing the RAND Corporation, National Defense University, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Why It Matters
This hearing informs potential changes to U.S. military doctrine and national security capabilities to better counter non-traditional threats from foreign adversaries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is hybrid warfare?
Why is the committee concerned about these tactics?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift in Military Doctrine
The committee explicitly acknowledges that U.S. military doctrine is currently ill-equipped for 'gray zone' conflicts, signaling a potential long-term shift in defense policy.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools