POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Competition in the Live Entertainment Industry

Original title: S. Hrg. 118-31 . THAT'S THE TICKET: PROMOTING COMPETITION AND PROTECTING CONSUMERS IN LIVE ENTERTAINMENT

January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal inquiry into the market power of major ticketing platforms and entertainment companies, which may influence future federal regulations or enforcement actions affecting ticket prices and consumer access to live events.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Live Nation Entertainment

The company's business practices and market position were the subject of testimony and committee questioning.

Consumers

The hearing focused on how industry competition affects ticket prices and access to live entertainment events.

Independent Venue Operators

The hearing examined how market concentration in ticketing and promotion impacts independent venues.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on January 24, 2023, to examine competition issues and consumer protection concerns within the live entertainment and ticketing industry. The session featured testimony from industry executives, legal experts, and artists regarding market dynamics and ticket sales practices.

Key Facts

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled 'That's the Ticket: Promoting Competition and Protecting Consumers in Live Entertainment' on January 24, 2023.
  • The hearing included testimony from representatives of Live Nation Entertainment, SeatGeek, Jam Productions, the American Antitrust Institute, and The James Madison Institute.
  • The committee collected written questions and responses from witnesses regarding industry practices, market competition, and consumer impacts.
  • The hearing record includes prepared statements from all six primary witnesses.
  • The committee members submitted follow-up questions to witnesses, which are documented in the hearing record.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal inquiry into the market power of major ticketing platforms and entertainment companies, which may influence future federal regulations or enforcement actions affecting ticket prices and consumer access to live events.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this Senate hearing?
The hearing was held to investigate competition and consumer protection issues within the live entertainment and ticketing industry.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included executives from Live Nation Entertainment and SeatGeek, the CEO of Jam Productions, a singer-songwriter, and representatives from the American Institute and The James Madison Institute.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 3 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Congressional Scrutiny of Ticketing

The hearing demonstrates a concerted effort by the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine the intersection of ticketing platforms and live event promotion.

Connected Entities

personSal NuzzoSenior Vice President at The James Madison InstituteMap →
personJack GroetzingerCEO of SeatGeekMap →
personClyde LawrenceSinger-songwriter and witnessMap →
personLindsey O. GrahamRanking Member of the Senate Judiciary CommitteeMap →
personKathleen BradishVice President for Legal Advocacy at American Antitrust InstituteMap →
personRichard J. DurbinChair of the Senate Judiciary CommitteeMap →
personJoe BerchtoldPresident and CFO of Live Nation EntertainmentMap →
personJerry MickelsonCEO and President of Jam Productions, LLCMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment60
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record