Hearings on the Creation of Jean Lafitte National Historical Park
July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearings document the legislative process and public testimony that led to the federal designation and protection of historical and environmental sites in Louisiana under the National Park Service.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Residents of Louisiana
The establishment of the park impacts local land use and historical preservation efforts in the state.
National Park Service
The agency is tasked with the potential management and oversight of the proposed historical park.
Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The document covers two specific hearing dates: December 17, 1977, in Gretna, Louisiana, and February 3, 1978, in Washington, D.C.
- The hearings were conducted by the Subcommittee on Parks and Recreation of the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- The primary subject of the hearings is S. 1829, a bill to establish the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park.
- The hearings represent the formal legislative record for the creation of the park.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of these hearings?
Where and when did these hearings take place?
Why It Matters
The hearings document the legislative process and public testimony that led to the federal designation and protection of historical and environmental sites in Louisiana under the National Park Service.
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Bicoastal Hearing Strategy
The committee held hearings both in the local area affected (Louisiana) and in the capital (Washington, D.C.), indicating a strategy to balance local input with federal legislative review.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools