POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on the Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2017

Original title: S. _, THE WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MITIGATION ACT OF 2017

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing marks the legislative review of a bill that proposes new tools for land managers to reduce and restore ecosystems, which directly impacts how federal forests are maintained and how wildfire risks are managed near communities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Land Managers

They would receive new tools and streamlined processes for forest management and post-fire restoration.

Wildlife Conservation Groups

The bill includes specific provisions for the habitat conservation of species like mule deer and sage grouse.

Residents in Fire-Prone Areas

They may be affected by changes in forest management practices intended to reduce the intensity and speed of future wildfires.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held a hearing to discuss a draft bill aimed at improving forest management and wildfire prevention. The proposed legislation focuses on streamlining land management processes and enhancing wildlife habitat conservation, though it does not address federal budget allocations for firefighting.

Key Facts

  • The hearing focused on a discussion draft of the Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2017.
  • The bill includes three titles aimed at habitat conservation for mule deer, sage grouse, and other wildlife.
  • The legislation proposes streamlining processes for land managers to address high-risk forest areas.
  • The bill explicitly excludes a budget fix for wildfire funding, as the Committee lacks jurisdiction over budget appropriations.
  • As of October 2017, there were 52,277 fires reported, covering 8.82 million acres.
  • Approximately 2.3 million acres of the burned area were located on national forests.
  • The hearing included testimony from the Wyoming State Forestry Division, the Mule Deer Foundation, and Sustainable Northwest.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill provide more money for fighting wildfires?
No. The Chairman stated that the bill does not include a budget fix because budget issues are outside the jurisdiction of the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
What is the main goal of this legislation?
The goal is to provide land managers with tools to reduce , improve wildlife habitat, and streamline the process for mitigating environmental damage after a fire occurs.

Why It Matters

This hearing marks the legislative review of a bill that proposes new tools for land managers to reduce and restore ecosystems, which directly impacts how federal forests are maintained and how wildfire risks are managed near communities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Holistic Forest Management Approach

The committee is shifting focus toward a 'holistic' approach that pairs preventive forest thinning with post-fire restoration, rather than focusing solely on fire suppression.

Connected Entities

personBill CrapserState Forester, Wyoming State Forestry DivisionMap →
personJohn BarrassoChairman of the Committee on Environment and Public WorksMap →
organizationCommittee on Environment and Public WorksSenate committee overseeing the hearingMap →
personMiles MorettiPresident/CEO, Mule Deer FoundationMap →
personDylan KrusePolicy Director, Sustainable NorthwestMap →
personThomas R. CarperRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record